The Party Of Choice
Connect with us on social media:
  • Home
  • Get To Know Us
    • What is Conservatism?
    • What Do We Believe?
    • Tyranny of the Majority
    • "Tough" Issues >
      • Abortion
      • Gay Marriage
      • Marijuana
    • Conservatism, Free Thinking, and a Central Vision
    • Invitation
  • The Eyes of One
  • Videos
    • Choice Words That Win Videos
    • The Refinery
    • Radio Interviews
  • Articles
    • Movie Reviews
  • Sponsor an Ad
  • Unite The Right
  • Events
  • Store
  • Resources
    • Talking Points from Grassroots Radio Colorado Show
    • Petition
    • spOILed The Movie - Time to Fill Up on Truth
    • Flyers
  • Contact Us

Will Santorum Be The Next Ken Buck?

1/8/2012

6 Comments

 
Let me start with a simple statement: If every GOP candidate were guaranteed to defeat Obama, I would select Rick Santorum.  They all display excellent qualities, but Santorum shares more of my views.  Besides, I really like the guy.

That said, I believe Santorum would lose badly to Obama because of a single issue—abortion.

For the record, I am Pro-Life, and Pro-Life candidates can win presidential elections.  America is evenly divided on the issue.  But politically, I break the abortion debate into four basic positions:

1.       Very Pro-Choice:  All abortion is acceptable; even late term and partial-birth.

2.       Pro-Choice:  Abortion is acceptable up to certain levels of development, but not partial-birth.

3.       Pro-Life:  Abortion is wrong, but allowable in cases of rape or danger to the mother’s life.

4.       Very Pro-Life:  All abortion is wrong, even after rape; only exception is danger to mother’s life.

A good, rational case can be made for Position 4, because while rape is horrifying, abortion brings death.  And people holding this view rightly cite the hypocrisy of merely jailing the rapist (who committed the crime) while killing the unborn child (who is innocent).

Conversely, those holding Position 3 argue that, while it would be noble for the victim to bring the child to term, she should not be legally forced to do so.  They contend that, after enduring a horrifying assault—an assault she never chose—she should not be forced to complete a 9 month pregnancy.

Both sides make fine points.  Though I personally hold Position 3, I have great respect for those holding Position 4.  I also respect some arguments for Position 2 (though I disagree), while I have no respect for Position 1 (which allows the butchery of Partial Birth Abortion).

So those are four basic positions, with my stance.  Now, let’s look at the political implications.

Truth is, assuming their stances are widely known, candidates holding Position 1 will struggle outside far-left districts, while those holding Position 4 do best in far-right districts.  I have no hard numbers, but I doubt you would even find 20% support for either 1 or 4 throughout society.  Obama, who likely holds Position 1, had to deny it and rely upon a willing press to cover for him, or he would have paid dearly.

Remember Ken Buck?  In 2010, he was Colorado’s GOP Senatorial candidate.  Honorable and intelligent, he polled well ahead of his Democratic foe on most issues.  Considering this race a lock, GOP strategist Dick Morris saw a Senate majority within reach.  And I too was confident—at first.

Then it came out that Buck held Position 4.  The moment I heard this, I told my wife, “We’ve just lost Colorado.  It’s over.”  There was no way we could sell Position 4 to most voters.  Soon, the phrase, “Buck: Too extreme for Colorado” went viral, and defending him felt like tossing rocks at a tidal wave.  Central to this campaign was Buck's position on abortion.

Desperately shifting to economic issues, the Buck campaign still anticipated victory, as fiscal concerns came first with Colorado voters.  We Conservatives were assured all would be fine.

But this approach was doomed.  It looked like a dodge.  People wanted to know, “Would Ken Buck really force a rape victim to go through with the pregnancy?”  The more Buck stressed fiscal topics, the more Democrats hit him on abortion (along with a clumsy statement he made about homosexuals).  In the end, Buck lost by a solid margin during a nationwide Republican rout.  His race was a stunning defeat.

And all this brings me to Rick Santorum.

The night he scored an impressive tie with Romney, Santorum’s Iowa miracle had Liberal pundits giddy with delight.  Naturally, Conservatives saw this as an act, geared to choose our candidate for us.

It was understandable.  Listening to multiple Conservative talk shows (yes, I’m a Dittohead), I heard hosts and callers alike pronouncing these Leftist celebrations to be contrived; staged by savvy strategists hoping to stop Santorum.  To summarize their sentiments:  “They’re afraid of a principled conservative!  They’re trying to con us into choosing that RINO Romney!  Reagan proved conservatism wins, while Dole and McCain proved that Moderates lose!  These pundits are trying to trick us!”

I generally share these views, in that I distrust Liberal pundits, and Moderate candidates often provide too little contrast against Democrat opponents.  But this time, I think our usually reliable suspicions are misplaced.  I really do.  Being a former Leftist, I am confident these Liberals weren’t acting at all—in fact, I believe they were restraining their exuberance.

I know all too well the strategy Obama’s billion dollar machine will unleash.  Exploiting Position 4, Obama’s surrogates and Leftist PAC’s will put Santorum on defense.  Predictably, Santorum will give well-packaged answers on the topic, then divert to Obama’s fiscal record.  We’ll hear how the economy is Issue #1 for Americans, and that we have nothing to fear.

But sinking poll numbers will bring a dire realization that we’ve helped Obama.  Rejecting Position 4, independent masses will send Santorum—an honorable and intelligent Republican—to likely defeat.

Just like Ken Buck.

For those who disagree, I’ll conclude with a simple challenge:  On your next free afternoon, go on a field trip.  Leave behind Tea Party meetings, Republican gatherings, church, and conservative friends.  Where should you go?  Try the mall; catch up on some shopping.  Visit a state college.  Go to a movie.  Or just walk through an office building.

And while surrounded by hundreds of people, ask yourself this question:  “How many of these voters think the federal government should force a 15 year old rape victim to carry out the pregnancy?”

After you’ve drawn your conclusion, think strategically—from the other side.  “How would opponents use this?  Would they play fair?  Would they allow us to keep the focus on Obama’s track record?  Who would the media help—us, or them?”

After this outing, I trust you’ll see why Iowa left the Democrats salivating.  They weren’t trying to con us, ladies and gentlemen.

They just couldn’t believe their good fortune.
6 Comments
Elizabeth Cramer
2/14/2012 04:01:43 pm

I'm from Colorado and I remember this well.

Now maybe you could add some information about how Governor Hickenlooper got elected.

It's sad but true, Tea Party strength in the primaries just kills you in the real election.

Reply
Cori
2/16/2012 10:03:05 am

Oh goodness, Elizabeth. I'm not sure I want to relive that disaster. It was so sad to see our party implode like that! The most disturbing part is that I'm watching us make the same mistake again with the Presidential primary. Instead of thoroughly vetting candidates and weighing the pros and cons, many people seem to be set on voting against the "Establishment" (whatever that is) and that's EXACTLY how we lost two very important races here in 2010.

Reply
ND
2/16/2012 06:38:39 pm

I too agree with the 3rd opinion on this issue,

It's up to the woman if she will have the kid of a criminal-stranger-attacker-assaulter who she was the unexpected-unwilling victim of !

Can we get this article over to Santorum,

So at least he can get a counter strategy ready to go when the Obama's-libs-Dems-Clintonista's-NOW-MM-MoveOn, DNC, start their full attacks against him !

When confronted on this issue, he should say that relating to his belief in the strict pro-life opinion, that he's just a strict believer-follower of his religeon.

And that he does have alot of sympathy-empathy for a women who is criminally-unwillingly attacked-assaulted-forced by a stranger,

or someone that they have met before, but never even remotely agreed to be with.

Having to face going through 9 months of having that criminals kid that was unwillingly forced upon her.

He should then say that the law now says the decision of how to proceed is up to the woman.

And conclude by saying that,

He admits that it's

difficult to reconcile the strict religeous view, what the woman has been put through, and the decision that she has to deal with on how to proceed.

He's just stating the policy of his religeon

BUT he does have alot of sympathy-empathy for what the woman has unwillingly gone-been-put through and the decisions that she has to deal with !

He has to shake the focus of this whole issue off of him and put it where it belongs, on the official doctrine and leaders of his religeon,

and NOT ON HIM !

Political strategy, strategy, strategy = neutralize-politically-motivated-criticism-attacks and

On to Victory !

Reply
Cori
2/18/2012 02:21:01 am

ND: I couldn't agree with you more. I don't know if we could get Santorum's campaign to listen to us. Personally, I'm still hoping (perhaps against hope) that he won't be our nominee. That said, feel free to share this article/link with people which will help us to alert others to this serious issue.

Yesterday, Hugh Hewitt's show was discussing Santorum and his social views. His guest was also concerned about the fact that he doesn't just have an opinion on social issues but that he's a crusader for them. For instance, when Romney was asked in a debate what his thoughts on contraception were, he responded with, "I think they're working just fine." The issue was dropped. Santorum on the other hand, launches into the subject with his personal convictions.

She also pointed out that the most successful Republican candidates are the ones who have opinions on social issues but build their platforms/campaigns on the fiscal issues.

We can win on the fiscal issues, but Americans don't want to be preached at on the social issues. Those are subjects that need to be discussed on a personal basis - not proclaimed from a political platform and I can't believe we're risking the Presidency over them. People's hearts must be changed before their minds will change and their minds must change before their votes will change.

And, if we don't take care of the fiscal problems ASAP, there won't be a country left to deal with the social concerns.

Reply
CB
2/18/2012 02:25:58 am

Like Cori and Andy, I, too, like Santorum for many reasons. But I like Romney, too, and I believe he can beat Obama.

If we don't win, we can't govern. If we don't govern, we get Obama's next wave of socialism: cap and tax on energy and gun control - that's after Obamacare is in force and our budget is even more broken.

When I talk with my independent friends and my siblings that lean left, they say they'd vote for Romney or Ron Paul. I can't support Paul for his nutty isolationist views, and I believe Romney's experience and judgment would make him the better president.

Think of it this way: What if we wake up Nov. 7 and Obama's still there? Will a vote for the most pure - but defeated - conservative save your children's future?

Reply
Andy
9/8/2012 07:37:17 am

"Will a vote for the most pure - but defeated - conservative save your children's future?"

Perfectly put. Absolutely perfectly put.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    November 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly