The Party Of Choice
Connect with us on social media:
  • Home
  • Get To Know Us
    • What is Conservatism?
    • What Do We Believe?
    • Tyranny of the Majority
    • "Tough" Issues >
      • Abortion
      • Gay Marriage
      • Marijuana
    • Conservatism, Free Thinking, and a Central Vision
    • Invitation
  • The Eyes of One
  • Videos
    • Choice Words That Win Videos
    • The Refinery
    • Radio Interviews
  • Articles
    • Movie Reviews
  • Sponsor an Ad
  • Unite The Right
  • Events
  • Store
  • Resources
    • Talking Points from Grassroots Radio Colorado Show
    • Petition
    • spOILed The Movie - Time to Fill Up on Truth
    • Flyers
  • Contact Us

Susan Rice Parenting   By Andy Peth

4/11/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture

​(The following is taken from a secret recording of Susan Rice with her son)
“…and that’s why good parents always keep a close eye on their kids.”
 
“But Mom—”
 
“Please, son, we don’t stand on formalities here.  Call me Former National Security Advisor, Susan Rice.”
 
“Former National—what?”
 
“Susan, for short.”
 
“Look, I don’t want my M—my Susan—surveilling me!”
 
“No, no, no, no!  I never surveil you!  I just record other people—people who speak with you.”
 
“But I’m in those recordings!”
 
“Oh, that’s just incidental!  Although…”
 
“Although what?”
 
“I’m a bit concerned about your interest in that new girl at school.  What do you really know about Katie, anyway?”
 
“Nothing!  I’m working up courage to talk to her!  I’ve only mentioned her to my best friends—”
 
“—real friends don’t leave cell phones open to compromise, dear—”
 
“—and written about her in my journal—”
 
“—which you did a terrible job hiding—”
 
“You’ve read my journal?!”
 
“No, no, no, no!  I just made copies.”
 
“No!”
 
“But when my boss, President Obama, ordered they be shared with sixteen other agencies, I might have overheard some things…”
 
“Mom!”
 
“Please!  Susan!  We don’t stand on—”
 
“Sixteen agencies have my journal???”
 
“Well, they’re calling it a diary.  ‘A boy and his diary.’”
 
“It’s a journal!”
 
“Sure it is, son.”
 
“Mom!”
 
“Susan!  Look, it’s my job to protect you!  That’s why I’ve also surveilled people Katie knows!  I may have picked up some incidental comments from Katie, too—”
 
 “Leave her alone!”
 
“I can’t!  There were national security concerns involving Katie, and—”
 
“National Security?  Like terrorism?”
 
“No, no, no, no!  We call it, ‘Spontaneous Protest…ism.’    You never know when random shooting can start over a YouTube video.”
 
“A what?”
 
“Katie mentioned YouTube videos, and that’s where it starts, young man!  One moment these kids are discussing YouTube, the next they’re gathering around embassies with rocket launchers they happened to find!  I’ve seen it a thousand times…”
 
“Mentioning YouTube makes Katie a terrorist?!”
 
“No, no, no, no!  A spontaneous protest-ist!  These things just happen, son—”
 
“—but—”
 
“—and we wouldn’t have known without your connection to Katie, and her connections to Russia.”
 
“Russia?”
 
“‘Katie’ can be short for ‘Katarina.’   That confirmed her Russian ties, so—”
 
“Russia?”
 
“But no one suspects you, son!   I assured the agents you’ve always ‘served with honor and distinction’—just like I said about Beau Bergdahl!”
 
“NO!”
 
“Katie’s name had to be unmasked for official review, of course—”
 
“PLEASE, NO!”
 
“Well don’t look at me!  I know nothing about the unmasking I did as part of my duties!”
 
“STOP IT!  JUST STOP IT!”
 
“What else could I do?  She mentioned YouTube!  YOUTUBE!!  But like I said on MSNBC, ‘I never leaked nothing to nobody!’  I just shared unmasked intel with sixteen other agencies!  Don’t you believe in sharing?”
 
“I used to!”
 
“It’s a good thing my boss changed those rules in his last week on the job for some reason!”
 
“But Katie’s innocent!”
 
“And she’ll have every chance to prove that when she testifies!”
 
“Testifies?!”
 
“Sure!  Like the team of agents told Katie while dragging her out of that crowded classroom—”
 
“NO!”
 
“—they said they would never have known about her potential for YouTube-related violence—”
 
“—omigosh-omigosh-omigosh—”
 
“—had you not provided her name—”
 
“—OMIGOSH-OMIGOSH-OMIGOSH—”
 
“—in those tear-soaked pages of your diary—”
 
“AUGH!  AUGH!  AAAAAAUUUUGH!!!”
 
“—that they found in your hope chest.”
 
“I DON’T HAVE A HOPE CHEST!!!”
 
“Are you sure?  The video shows Katie screaming your name, and the agents yelling, ‘Hey!  Quit blaming the sissy with the diary in his hope chest!’”
 
“AUGH!  AAAAUUUUGH!!!”
 
“I saw it on YouTube.”
 
“But—”
 
“Relax, they’re professionals!  They also provide security for United Airlines!”
 
“NOOOOO!!!”
 
“And I can assure you they didn’t use chemical weapons!  Like I said when asked about Syria, United Airlines has agreed to ‘voluntarily and verifiably give up its chemical weapons stockpile’—meaning they won’t violate international law when dealing with overbooked flights!”
 
“WHAT?!”
 
“Though personally, I wouldn’t go near Katie without a hazmat suit...jus’ sayin’…”
 
“I WANT A NEW MOMMY!”
 
“Please, it’s Susan!”
 
“MY MOMMY IS EVIL!!!”
 
“Now don’t start believing fake news reports where they keep quoting me!”
 
“AAAAAAAUUUUUUGH!!!”
(The recording cuts out here.  Ms. Rice has declined to testify on its contents)
0 Comments

Learning From Beck and Lahren   By Andy Peth

4/4/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
The case of Tomi Lahren’s firing from The Blaze shows why Republicans are struggling to govern in Washington—and all of us are to blame.
 
Huh?  Follow me here.
 
Sure, I think Lahren erred in calling pro-life Conservatives like me "hypocrites," but I also think Glenn Beck overreacted by firing her.  This was a classic case of Conservatives showing our inability to reconcile. 
 
If I were Beck, I’d have responded thusly:  "Tomi, I support every choice that doesn't take away someone else's choice, so we only disagree on when someone else's choice is in play.  I think human life begins earlier, you think later
--a disagreement over science, not Conservatism.  Neither of us is a hypocrite.”
 
That would end it.  Lahren would take back her “hypocrite” comment, and all would be well.
 
But Beck didn’t do that, and here’s why:  He doesn’t think in those terms.  Neither does Lahren.  And lest anyone blame them, the fact is few Conservatives today do think in those terms.   
 
The problem?  Today’s Conservatives draw the wrong lines.  Rather than draw a clear line between us and the Left, we sketch an elaborate maze within the Right, labeling anyone failing to walk our chosen path as “hypocrites,” “RINO’s,” “purists”—pick a brand. 
 
Lahren made this mistake, labeling as “hypocrites” any Conservatives not walking her path.  Beck responded in kind, banishing her for not walking his path.  And in Washington, Paul Ryan and Rand Paul made this mistake when trying to replace Obamacare (more on that later).
 
Let’s try something different:  Back out of the maze.  Let’s walk out where we entered, and allow me to draw some clear, simple lines:
 
Line #1:  I want to control my own life, not yours.  This is the heart of self-governance.  Agree with this basic statement, and you’re a Conservative; you’re on our side of the line.  If you disagree and wish to control others, you’re a Liberal.  So the line I draw is between Choice (Conservative) and Control (Liberal).
 
But of course, some control is necessary, lest we descend into lawlessness.  So how do we decide which choices are okay? 
 
Simple.  Just draw the next line.
 
Line #2:  I support every choice that doesn’t take away someone else’s choice.  If my choice removes your choice, that’s control—and we Conservatives don’t like that. 
 
For instance, suppose I choose to steal a woman’s purse.  Removing her choice of what to do with her money, my choice is a crime.  Or suppose I create Obamacare, removing many choices, from coverage options to doctors to making healthy young people buy more than they need.  By removing all these choices, my choice crosses the line.  I’m controlling people. 
 
The beauty of using my two lines—beyond their simplicity—is their flexibility.  Sure, they unite Conservatives, as no Liberal can stay for long on our side of them without killing decades of Democrat legislation.  But within Conservatism itself, these lines permit great diversity of thought and application.
 
Why?  Because while Conservatives agree on these two lines, they won’t always agree on where the second one is drawn.  In other words, they won’t always agree about when one person’s choice removes another person’s choice.  And that’s okay.  
 
Recognizing this, we on the Right can respectfully discuss where to draw Line #2 on each issue, respecting anyone who at least commits to standing on our side of the two lines.  So if neither you nor I want our choices taking away the choices of others, that agreement alone lowers hostility.  Now we share a common goal.  Now we're talking the same language.  Now we can relax, accept each other, and discuss the tough issues currently tearing Conservatives apart.

Had Lahren and Beck done this on the issue of abortion—as I demonstrated—they would have reconciled.  Not agreed, mind you, but reconciled.  They'd still be a team.  But they didn't, so now they're a fiasco.  And their failure came not because they aren’t Conservatives, but because they forgot what makes a Conservative.  Leaving behind simple lines, they entered the maze. 
 
Likewise, while Paul Ryan and Rand Paul ideally want similar healthcare plans, they disagree on how to get there in the current political climate.  I prefer Paul’s plan, but I agree with Ryan that the political road to that plan—and the fallout of enacting it—could be treacherous.
 
Notice how Ryan and Paul are on the same side of my two lines.  But failing to see this, each demanded the other walk a “correct” path through the maze.  So just like Lahren and Beck, they became disrespectful, incurring great failure instead of success.
 
Ultimately, is this their fault?  No, it’s ours.  We’re their constituency; those pressuring them to navigate a maze rather than unite on our side of simple lines.  We’re Ryan’s moderate district, telling him to move slowly, avoiding major backlash.  We’re also Paul’s libertarian base, telling him to implement pure market principles now, lest Washington erode more liberties.  Thanks to us, these two guys face enormous pressure.
 
Our civil war is so foolish.  Hunting each other in a maze—like amateurs playing paintball—we have no right to chastise Beck, Lahren, Ryan, or Paul.  Until we back out of the maze, our leaders must echo our division—or lose their base.  We built the maze, folks.  They’re trapped in it.
 
It’s hard to believe we won last November, as our civil war turns us from America’s political victors into America’s political joke.  Meanwhile, Democrat leaders have no time for mazes.  Standing proudly on the opposite side of both lines, they play for keeps.  No games.  No paintball.  They want nothing less than total control over the choices of others, and our amateur infighting is handing it to them.
 
So, are Beck and Lahren bad people?  No, they’re good Conservatives stuck in a bad maze, with the rest of us cheering on “our guy” like mobs at a cage match.  This isn’t succeeding, folks.  It never will.  We need to draw the right lines, debate respectfully, and work together. 
 
Then we can govern.  Then we can save America.
 
And we’d better do it soon.

0 Comments

    Author

    Archives

    July 2023
    June 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    November 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly