The Party Of Choice
Connect with us on social media:
  • Home
  • Get To Know Us
    • What is Conservatism?
    • What Do We Believe?
    • Tyranny of the Majority
    • "Tough" Issues >
      • Abortion
      • Gay Marriage
      • Marijuana
    • Conservatism, Free Thinking, and a Central Vision
    • Invitation
  • The Eyes of One
  • Videos
    • Choice Words That Win Videos
    • The Refinery
    • Radio Interviews
  • Articles
    • Movie Reviews
  • Sponsor an Ad
  • Unite The Right
  • Events
  • Store
  • Resources
    • Talking Points from Grassroots Radio Colorado Show
    • Petition
    • spOILed The Movie - Time to Fill Up on Truth
    • Flyers
  • Contact Us

Pre-Debate Warning Signs   by Andy Peth

10/28/2015

2 Comments

 
Picture
Let’s get serious about tonight’s debate.  Now that Hillary is the Democrat nominee, it’s time to honestly assess the GOP field.  With each candidate, we must ask, “How would this person do against Hillary?”
 
Notice I didn’t say, “correctly assess,” as it’s too early for cocky prognostications.  So far, the only bold prediction I’ve made was stating (for more than a year now) that Jeb Bush had no chance to be the nominee.  Score one for me.  But starting tonight, let’s share brutally honest opinions on candidates. 
 
Notice I said, “honest opinions.”  Not chest-thumping bravado ignoring weaknesses.  Not Facebook hit-posts with attack lists against rivals—which are always littered with out-of-context exaggerations.
 
I’ll go first.  For several candidates, I will provide a couple strengths and at least one concern—hard questions I want asked about that candidate before we commit.  In closing, I’ll give a 1-10 score for how well I believe this candidate would do against Hillary Clinton. 
 
Notice I said, “against Hillary Clinton.”  This score reflects how I feel a candidate’s broad appeal and debate style work against Hillary, not how much I like the candidate.  If liking the candidate was my top criteria, this entire article would proclaim Bobby Jindal as “The One.” 
 
Spoiler alert:  Bobby’s not even on this list.
 
Ready?  Let’s begin.
 
Donald Trump
 
Strengths: 
  • Uncanny gift for tapping into deep passions on key issues.
  • Tremendous “Star Appeal,” creating strength across multiple demographics. 
 
Warning Sign #1:  Can a candidate win today with only 15% Hispanic support?  That’s amazingly low.
 
Warning Sign #2:  Can a candidate with such lack of focus perform well debating Hillary Clinton?  Hillary’s weaknesses must be exposed with the skill of a prosecuting attorney, not generalized insults. 
 
Score Against Hillary:  5
 
Ben Carson
 
Strengths:
  • Most disarming verbal style I’ve ever seen.  Like, ever.
  • Superior intellect combined with plain answers.
  • Black and popular.
 
Warning Sign #1:  This week, Dr. Carson voiced opposition to abortion in cases of rape and incest.  While he didn’t say he’d outlaw abortion in these cases, he didn’t say he wouldn’t.  I was curious how this might affect Ben’s run, so I asked on Facebook, “Could Carson win with such a view?”  Though nearly all respondents were in my socially conservative sphere, not one felt this view helps Carson—many said he couldn’t win with it, period.  Wow.  Since very few Americans would outlaw abortion in such cases, this markedly drops Carson’s score against Hillary.
 
Warning Sign #2:  As with Trump, Carson lacks focus in cornering a wily defendant.  Can his debate style pin down an immensely corrupt Democrat who receives full media protection?
 
Score against Hillary:  6 (before this week, 8)
 
Carly Fiorina
 
Strengths:
  • Perfect, blunt approach to exposing and weakening Hillary.
  • Quick, understandable answers, both in untangling complex issues (foreign policy) and thwarting criticism (Carly’s record at HP).
  • Female and popular.
 
Warning Sign:  Can Carly go beyond her stump speech in addressing issues?  Her “first two phone calls” answer on foreign policy is becoming threadbare, as are her comments on what we could do but haven’t yet done in the Middle East.  Carly lacks Marco Rubio’s complete command on issues.
 
Score against Hillary:  9
 
Ted Cruz
 
Strengths:
  • Smart, effective debater.
  • Supremely principled; trusted by base.
  • Great ground game.
 
Warning Sign:  In head-to-head polling against Hillary, Ted polls among the very worst in the field.  New numbers aren’t available, but Real Clear Politics over the summer gave him a devastating -7.7%.  Question:  I love Ted, but can he beat Hillary when we’ll need to re-win millions of voters?

Understand, there's nothing wrong with Ted.  What's wrong is an American electorate that can only absorb so much truth between reality TV shows and Bernie Sanders rallies.

 
Score against Hillary:  4
 
Marco Rubio
 
Strengths:
  • Gifted communicator in all 3 settings—speeches, debates, and interviews.
  • Young, good-looking Hispanic who speaks fluent Spanish.
  • Innovative thinker on tough issues (higher education) with total command of most issues.
 
Warning Sign:  Rubio is smooth and a fine debater, but he isn’t a forceful interrogator.  He also lacks Trump’s and Christie’s blunt, plain-talking style that connects with listeners.   Ask yourself, “Am I confident Marco would relentlessly pin Hillary to the wall on her corruption?  Am I really?”
 
Score against Hillary:  9
 
Chris Christie
 
Strengths:
  • Ideal interrogator for pressing the issue against corrupt opponents (see:  Hillary)
  • Excellent in interviews, both on Conservative stations like Fox or liberal nighttime talk shows.
  • Blunt, “every guy” style that connects with apolitical viewers.
  • Wins big in liberal state.
 
Warning Sign:  Can a guy win without devout support from the GOP base?  Really? 
 
Score against Hillary: 8 (but only a 2 against the GOP field)
 
Rejecting Andy-ness
 
Is my analysis perfect?  Does Andy know all?  Of course not.  But right now, we must share opinions, discussing candidates as dispassionately as possible.  Tonight and going forward, we must put each suitor under our collective microscope, asking, “How would this person do against Hillary?”
 
I’ve already eliminated my favorite.  Startling as it may seem, the last quality I seek in candidates is "Whoever agrees with Andy the most.”   Why?  Because the Republican Party—and Conservatism as a whole—is a family.  It isn’t millions of Andy’s walking around (though that would be glorious).  It’s millions of liberty-loving people who see liberty in different ways.  And when I look out upon this movement, I realize I couldn’t love their individualism if I demanded they agree with me.
 
So I reject Andy-ness.  When I watch tonight’s debate, I don’t want candidates forcing the Conservative family to act like me.  I want to be part of something bigger than Andy; something challenging me daily, extending our impact far beyond my limited scope.  As I watch, I’ll ask myself, “Who does the best job selling Conservatism to a nation that has long abandoned it?”
 
I want someone who sells all of us.  Not just my kind.  Not just me.  All of us.
 
You’ve heard my opinions on our candidates.  I’d welcome yours.

2 Comments
Marla Hughes
10/28/2015 05:14:36 pm

Great analysis and I agree about Jindal, however IMO you're way off on Cruz, Carly and Rubio.
I don't think Carly will make it through the end of the year, but I think she'd do very well head to head against Hillary. Rubio is not easy to rattle and the only issue he'd have is from his right flank IMO. Hillary will use that against him effectively. Cruz is far too abrasive against his own base voters so I don't see him getting past the end of the year, either.

Reply
Andy
10/28/2015 09:13:35 pm

I think all three will make it to at least February, but I could be wrong. Rubio dominated again tonight, along with Cruz, Christie, and to a lesser extent, Fiorina.

What did you think?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    November 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly