The Party Of Choice
Connect with us on social media:
  • Home
  • Get To Know Us
    • What is Conservatism?
    • What Do We Believe?
    • Tyranny of the Majority
    • "Tough" Issues >
      • Abortion
      • Gay Marriage
      • Marijuana
    • Conservatism, Free Thinking, and a Central Vision
    • Invitation
  • The Eyes of One
  • Videos
    • Choice Words That Win Videos
    • The Refinery
    • Radio Interviews
  • Articles
    • Movie Reviews
  • Sponsor an Ad
  • Unite The Right
  • Events
  • Store
  • Resources
    • Talking Points from Grassroots Radio Colorado Show
    • Petition
    • spOILed The Movie - Time to Fill Up on Truth
    • Flyers
  • Contact Us

For Shame   by Andy Peth

2/3/2016

8 Comments

 
Picture
I’m talking to fellow Christians today, but non-Christians may wish to listen. 
 
Much was made of Ted Cruz’s recent “shaming” mailer in Iowa, but he’s not the first to use heavy-handed tactics.  Democrats always do it.  Republicans have done it.  Rubio followed suit, albeit to a much lighter degree.  Today, I will highlight Cruz’s mailer because it is the most recent example, but make no mistake:  This is not about Ted Cruz.  It’s about us.  Every Christian candidate will let us down—this was just Ted’s turn—but what really matters is our response.
 
Mailing Out Shame
 
Let’s look at some of the text from Cruz’s Iowa Mailers, which were formatted to look like official documents and entitled “Voting Violation”:
 
“Your individual voting history, as well as your neighbors’ are public record. Their scores are published below, and many of them will see your score as well. CAUCUS ON MONDAY TO IMPROVE YOUR SCORE and please encourage your neighbors to caucus as well.  A follow-up notice may be issued following Monday’s caucuses.”
 
Below the text was a list of actual neighbors’ names, with letter grades (F, C-, D, etc.) and percentages.  The mailer really did give neighbors’ names and voting records.
 
Okay then.
 
Shame is a powerful motivator.  The clear intent of these mailers was to scare, intimidate, and with the risk of follow-up notices, threaten.  Worse yet, since the mailers targeted people the Cruz campaign felt would support them, these “Voting Violations” were actually meant to frighten Cruz’s own base.
 
Logic, Scripture, and The Search For Loopholes
 
In the aftermath, I saw countless defenses offered by Cruz supporters.  Let me boil some down and address each—sometimes with scripture.  Again, let’s think of these in terms of all Christian candidates, not just Cruz.
 
“These are just junk mail.  No one takes them seriously.”
 
If candidates thought every mailer would be discarded, they wouldn’t mail them.  Clearly, the goal with these mailings is to create real fear and shame, using intimidation as a motivator.
 
“There’s nothing wrong with sharing their names and voting records with neighbors.  It’s public info.”
 
First, just because something is public record, that doesn’t mean neighbors will spend the time and money to discover it.  Second, if they do, they then will have chosen it—such information will not be foisted upon them in their homes.  Third, virtually no neighbor would do this.  Fourth, such data would not come in the form of violations and threats.

Let’s see what Jesus had to say about public shaming over personal failings:

“If your brother or sister sins, go and point out their fault, just between the two of you. If they listen to you, you have won them over.
​

But if they will not listen, take one or two others along, so that ‘every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.”

Matthew 18:15-16
The designed purpose of these mailers is to say, “You’ve performed poorly, and so have your neighbors.  We are exposing you all publicly, and may do so again after Caucus.”   Slice it any way you want, but this is the opposite of Christ’s approach, which used private options first before expanding outward. 
 
Now, someone might say, “But that was talking about sinning, not voting poorly!”  But this is a dodge.   Those sending these mailers are politically motivated, so failure to vote violates their standards; these mailers shame people for the “sin” of low participation.  This is a public rebuke for alleged failure, and dancing with rhetoric just exposes our desire to help our candidates by evading biblical principle.
 
“These scores aren’t even real.”
 
If this is true (and I’m not saying it is), then that’s even worse, for it is lying.  Biblically, lying = bad.
 
“This is just politics.” 
 
If someone can show me the “political waiver” in scripture, I’m more than happy to print it.
 
“If a little public shaming is what it takes to get them to do what’s right, that’s just fine.”
 
Public shame makes us fear people; fearing their reproach or low opinion.  Since fellow Christians will surely be among those contacted, the Christian candidate wants to create fear in Christ’s body—fear of criticism from the world.  But biblically, we are told the exact opposite—that we should fear God alone, not seeking to gain acceptance from men:

“Hear me, you who know what is right, you people who have taken my instruction to heart:  Do not fear the reproach of men, or be terrified by their insults.”
Isaiah 51:7
 
“For am I now seeking the favor of men, or of God? Or am I striving to please men? If I were still trying to please men, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ.”
Galatians 1:10
These mailers motivate people to fear men or seek their favor—all to generate political turnout.  It’s hard to imagine a more thoroughly unchristian approach.
 
“Making them look official just enhances the effect.  Everyone knows they aren’t official.”
 
If everyone knew this, then the effect wouldn’t be enhanced.  Clearly, these mailers look official in order to heighten fear of real consequences.  Deceptive from the start, this is lying to fellow Republicans.
 
“Others have done it too.”
 
First of all, not everyone does each shaming practice.  For instance, Ted’s mailer far exceeded what any other campaign did (though I expect others will do worse pretty soon).  Second, Christ’s Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) entirely called us to embrace higher standards than those around us—not lower. 
 
Third, using worldly norms as our excuse to evade Christian standards is almost laughably unbiblical:

“For though we live in the world, we do not wage war as the world does.”
II Corinthians 10:3
 
“Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.”
Romans 12:2
Am I disappointed in our candidates?  Sure, but I’m much more disappointed in our tortured defenses of them.  Though taught to “seek first the kingdom of God,” we Christians often seek loopholes for our heroes.  Let me tell you something:  Countering these endless dodges is exhausting.  Every time one of our “Christian” candidates does something sleazy, I feel less like a concerned brother in the Lord, and more like a prosecuting attorney.  I hate that feeling.
 
In times like these, the greatest shame is when we feel none.
 
Learning From A Tax Collector
 
Do you know about tax collectors in the time of Christ?  These were Jews working for the Romans, collecting taxes from their Jewish countrymen.  Yikes.  Worse yet, the common way for tax collectors to get ahead was to take more than Rome required—thus the tax collectors were very rich.  Among tax collectors, this terrible act was accepted practice.
 
One wealthy chief tax collector named Zacchaeus was inspired by his encounter with Jesus:
“But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, ‘Look, Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the amount.’
 
Jesus said to him, ‘Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham.  For the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.’”
Luke 19:8-10

So in the presence of Jesus, the terrible but accepted act was stopped, and even reversed.
 
Get the point?
 
Cruz’s mailers are but one example of many unscriptural methods Republicans use.  And I hear all the excuses.  “It’s public information.”  “The Democrats do it, so we’ll lose if we don’t.”  “People should know these are junk mail.”  
 
Here’s the big truth for Christians:  Like Zacchaeus, we’re all in Christ’s presence, and we should all be inspired to discard accepted but wrong practices.  That should be our first step.  The second should be turning it to our political advantage:
 
Here’s one way:  Shame the bad tactics, not the voters.  Shame the leaders and politicians using such tactics, and in so doing, turn their bad practices to our advantage. 
 
For instance, rather than using shame-and-scare mailers, call out those who do—and make it a big deal.  Point at Obama’s usage of such mailers in 2012, saying how we’d never treat people that way.  Admit we’ve done this, then apologize and drop the practices, challenging Democrats to do the same. 
 
Since Democrats can’t win without power moves and deception, their only choices would be to either continue the practices—thus making us look good—or discontinue the practices and fight on level footing—thus removing their strength.  Either way, we win.
 
The worldly response to unethical practices is, “If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em!”—but that puts the game on the Democrats’ home field.  The Christian way is, “Expose ‘em, and in so doing, beat ‘em.”  This puts the game on our field, leaving Democrats scrambling for answers.
 
I prefer this way.  I’ll win bigger, and I’ll actually like the guy in the mirror.
 
Going Forward…In The Light
 
Look, every candidate falls short, and that’s no reason to abandon them.  But we also shouldn’t abandon principles.  Letting devotion to candidates exceed devotion to truth, we Christians cease to be, well, us.
 
Let me tell you what non-Christians hear when we dance and dodge:  They hear the world means more to us than Jesus.  Period.  They hear us saying, “Hey, I talk about God, but I’m as hooked on this world as you are.  My faith is a crutch for coping, not a guide to higher truth.  I have nothing special to offer.”
 
Fellow believers, it’s time we decided what we stand for.  Do we stand for God in a godless nation?  Do we stand for principle in a land of capitalizing on accepted practices?  Do we stand for loving our neighbors, or pressuring them?  When we come face to face with our Lord, what will we say?  Did we stand for Him, or…
 
 …for shame?
8 Comments
Sherrie
2/3/2016 08:21:48 pm

I agree with you completely. If I had a dollar for every time I have heard "It's just politics" I'd be a very wealthy woman. I get very tired of people excusing bad behavior just because they are our "Heros". When is corruption okay? When it's a Republican, a favored politician, our family? It seems as though we are more willing to give someone a pass the closer they get to home.

Reply
Andy Peth
2/3/2016 08:27:04 pm

Yep. And that's the big problem. We're more than enablers; it's almost like we push our candidates to ignore principle. Like I said, Ted's just the guy doing it this week--someone else will next week. I only picked the issue apart to show what lengths people will go to in defending the indefensible--and all too often, these are fellow believers.

Reply
Joan Brehon
2/3/2016 09:54:05 pm

You are right. Thanks for this post. I have not defended what was wrong, but have gone after Dr; Carson because his staff gave CNN the information. He took the opportunity to go after Ted Cruz without finding out any information. His actions are just as wrong as Ted Cruz and organization. Both have a black mark. Looking for the perfect candidate that doesn't disappoint. Jesus isn't running.

Reply
Jacqueline
2/3/2016 10:47:38 pm

Should Rahab not have lied? Should David have been refused the holy bread by the temple priest and left in hunger on the run from Saul? I'm not justifying sin but perhaps it is not so cut and dry. Are we not told to be wise as serpents and harmless as doves? While I do follow your logic, it comes off a bit like a principle wagging his finger and scolding a child for throwing a punch on the play ground for sticking up for himself after a bathroom head flush by known school thugs who would do it again if they could get away with it. Will converts be made in a political environment with this promoted "shaming?" What is the goal here after the shaming - if your conclusions are right? A presidential candidate viewed as a pushover is not attractive or tough. How could such a person deal with a Muslim leader who views lying as an acceptible tool according to his faith to accomplish his goals. Politics is a lot like war. War was a tool God used to accomplish his goals. It's bloody sometimes and ugly but there is no doubt that His methods worked for His undoubtedly Godly purposes.

Now, having said all this, I must say that I do not recommend my "war" method or your "turn the other cheek" method be applied to politics as a rule because after all God's purpose was saving people. I'm merely pointing out that to become a "king" on earth has a vastly different endgame than the King of the universe. Heaven on earth cannot be made by a sinful man - only God will do this and in His time. Until then it is not yet time to hammer our swords into plow shears. In the sincerest love of Christ,

Reply
Andy Peth
2/4/2016 12:17:46 pm

Rahab lied to save lives, not scare people into turnout for political gain.

"Wise as serpents" doesn't read "Bad as serpents."

Ted also wasn't protecting himself--not on a playground or anywhere else. He was scaring, shaming, and threatening his own voters--all for turnout. Is that harmless as a dove? Not for anyone who believed the mailer. And for those who didn't, Ted was lying--also not good.

Look, I really don't want to be mean here, but all your rationalizations amount to "the ends justify the means," not "Do all for the glory of God." The bottom line is that you don't want to think Ted could do something really wrong, but by scriptural standards, he did. I can't help that.

With Ted or any other candidate, we must ask ourselves what matters to us: Do we want our candidate to be right, or do we want God's principles to be upheld?

Go to God and talk it over. I'll do the same.

Reply
Drew
2/4/2016 03:03:05 am

In the transgressions of our politicians, this one is trivial a best. Cruz and his surrogates are street fighters....and will push the envelope to win.

Yes, I agree with you that ethically the Cruz campaign stepped over the line and absolutely their actions should not be condoned. I hold Cruz to a higher standard and I am disappointed by tactics...no matter how effective or well intentioned. In fairness, it should be noted that these tactics expose a far more abhorrent behavior. These individuals operate under a cloak of presumed confidentiality which enables this disingenuous behavior. While they are protected constitutionally, they apparently are not protected from public disclosure. If one's political decisions invoke shame or can be used to intimidate, perhaps it says more about that person's views than it does about those who might seek political gain from exposing those decisions. Two wrongs don't make a right.....but in this case, I'm not going to lose sleep over a mistep by the Cruz campaign.

Reply
Hugo
2/4/2016 10:42:14 am

Andy, While I agree with the sentiment, I have cannot reconcile your approach with reality. Jacqueline put it pretty succinctly. Politics is by nature an adversarial proposition. If you want to win you mu add to get down and wrestle in the mud, so to speak. Does that mean that "anything" goes? Of course not. But the limitations proposed by your piece, while certainly noble, are simply a recipe for disaster. One only need to recent history to see.the results of your approach.

Personally, I am tired of our side losing and simply "taking the high road". If we want to effect change, we first must win the election. Then we can govern from a position of moral principle.

In conclusion, respectfully, I believe your assessment of the mailer campaign is a bit over the top. It was a clever use of campaign strategy, especially if it worked.

Reply
Andy Peth
2/4/2016 12:06:38 pm

Hugo, it wasn't over the top, because nothing I wrote was untrue or exaggerated. "Getting in the mud" with opponents is one thing--our candidates must be able to duke it out.

But this "clever use of campaign strategy" was an absolutely unchristian act by a professing Christian. You say these candidates have to get in the mud with their opponents, but none of Ted's opponents went nearly this far--not that he'd be justified in doing it if they did. Ted didn't reluctantly get dragged into the mud. He led the way, and virtually no one followed.

So tell me, did Jesus face an "adversarial proposition" in dealing with the Pharisees? Then where did He abandon principles in his encounters with them? Give me chapter and verse.

Let me be frank: Neither you nor anyone else protesting this article have referenced one single scriptural principle. All of you have sought to downplay Ted's actions while creating an anything goes, scripture-free zone for our "Christian" politicians. You say you don't believe in anything goes, but how much worse can we get than scaring, shaming, intimidating, and threatening our own supporters?

Fact is, if no one had ever used a mailer like that, and then Donald Trump or Jeb Bush did it out of the blue, all of Ted's defenders would be calling for open revolt. But since others have done similar things, the world becomes our excuse. THAT IS THE STANDARD OF AN UNPRINCIPLED MOVEMENT, HUGO. The water gradually gets hotter, so the frog doesn't think it's hot.

Read Matthew 5-7 and tell me what Jesus thinks of using excuses to settle for the standards of others. Meanwhile, look at our candidates raising hands and praising Jesus while burning His principles, then look at us chasing loopholes to allow it, and finally look at all the unbelievers who see this and laugh at our faith.

I'm only attacked when I question Ted Cruz. I hammer Rubio on sugar subsidies, I hammer Carson on 15% ethanol, I hammer Bush on Common Core, I hammer Trump on numerous items--but I'm only attacked when I dare question Ted.

That's really troubling, especially since I think Ted would make a great president.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Archives

    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    August 2019
    June 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    September 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    November 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly